GTADB.GG

Methodology

Every claim on GTADB carries a visible evidence rating and traces to a record in the source database. This page is the contract behind those badges.

The evidence ladder

  • Officially confirmed

    Explicitly named or described by Rockstar Games or Take-Two — site pages, Newswire posts, official store/media publications.

  • Seen in official footage

    Clearly visible in Rockstar-published video or imagery, described without interpretive leaps.

  • Identified

    Strong identification built on official evidence — e.g. figures carried consistently by announcement-day coverage of an official reveal.

  • Probable

    Strong evidence exists but identification isn't definitive — e.g. a mechanic described by press previews of official footage without first-party wording.

  • Unconfirmed

    Community or speculative claims without sufficient evidence. Rarely recorded at all; never presented as fact.

  • Debunked

    Previously circulated claims contradicted by stronger evidence — kept visible so the record corrects the rumor.

Rules we hold ourselves to

Sources. First-party Rockstar/Take-Two publications are the backbone. Press is cited only for announcement-day details Rockstar released but didn't restate in writing (like US pricing), and is always marked as press. The 2022 development leak and other stolen material are never sources — early, unrepresentative, and wrong to platform.

Naming. We never invent names. A vehicle Rockstar hasn't named either stays out of the database or enters with an honest descriptive identifier and a sub-official rating — certainty is never fabricated.

Corrections. When a fact changes or we get one wrong, the record is corrected, its verification date updated, and the change logged publicly in the discovery feed — the database's audit trail. We don't silently rewrite history.

Tooling. GTADB is researched and maintained with software assistance (including AI tooling) for cataloguing and cross-referencing, but no fact is published without a citable source — the evidence bar applies to the workflow, not just the output.

Report an error. Spotted something wrong or missing a source? Email corrections@gtadb.gg with a link to the record and, ideally, the source we should be citing.